去博客还是不去博客

最近,冷泉港实验室表示将要求博客作者  在撰写演示文稿之前先征得许可, 就像记者一样令人惊讶的社论  性质 说“这不仅是一个坏主意,而且应该被忽略。

性质 已经证明研究人员写博客是好的。对有价值结果的严格讨论原则上不应仅限于会议厅的墙壁甚至期刊的页面。任何人都可以注册的任何会议对于所有可用的通信技术都是公平的比赛—任何无法监管的规则都将被忽略。

当然,我对此有自己的看法,但是我们的读者,通常是科学家和博客作者怎么看?

M博士(1801帖子)

Craig McClain is the Executive Director of the Lousiana University Marine Consortium. He has conducted deep-sea research for 20 years and published over 50 papers in the area. He has participated in and led dozens of oceanographic expeditions taken him to the Antarctic and the most remote regions of the Pacific and Atlantic. Craig’s research focuses 上 how energy drives the biology of marine invertebrates from individuals to ecosystems, specifically, seeking to uncover how organisms are adapted to different levels of carbon availability, i.e. food, and how this determines the kinds and number of species in different parts of the oceans. Additionally, Craig is obsessed with the size of things. Sometimes this translated into actually scientific research. Craig’s research has been featured 上 National Public Radio, Discovery Channel, Fox News, 国家地理 and ABC News. In addition to his scientific research, Craig also advocates the need for scientists to connect with the public and is the founder and chief editor of the acclaimed Deep-Sea News (http://jiaxiangsuji.com/), a popular ocean-themed blog that has won numerous awards. His writing has been featured in Cosmos, Science Illustrated, American Scientist, Wired, Mental Floss, and the Open Lab: The Best Science Writing 上 the Web.


3 Replies to “去博客还是不去博客”

  1. 我读(有时写)科学博客。我的感受与伊希斯博士保持一致’帖子(在下面引用),除了我认为博客安全的图标是个好主意:

    http://scienceblogs.com/isisthescientist/2009/06/all_the_conference_stuff_thats.php

    “我想在会议上看到记者和博主谈论所有准备谈论的科学。但是,如果’如果没有问题,那么博主也可以请求许可。我喜欢谈论我的科学。我喜欢看我的科学讨论。但是,作为我的科学的设计师,我需要拥有决定我的科学出现地点的自由裁量权。

    答案是’t要求参与者在海报上贴一个博客安全图标,以便您不要’不必与科学家进行互动,并且可以尽可能快地发布更多推文和帖子。它’与科学家交谈,询问他们的工作,并了解他们发现的合理解释。

    不然我’m not gonna lie, I’我将开始吵架。”

  2. 会议一直是公共场所。竞争对手始终能够走到您的海报上,看着它,并告诉他们想要的任何人。我不知道’无法理解为什么人们认为规则已经改变。

  3. 科学博客为重要研究提供了一个更容易获得的机会。对于不这样做的人尤其如此’白天和黑夜里浏览成千上万篇经过同行评审的期刊,它们只是在寻找一个有趣的,经过研究的故事。

    我支持“Nature” editorial comment.

Comments are closed.